logoalt Hacker News

afavouryesterday at 7:19 PM3 repliesview on HN

Presumably the biggest loser in all this is Zig, I only know of the language because of Bun.

But the timescale still gives me pause… just because AI lets us convert a codebase in 6 days doesn’t mean it’s wise. There are surely a lot of downstream implications! It’s always felt a little like Bun is making up a plan as it goes along (and maybe that’s unfair), this seems to underline the point.


Replies

nine_kyesterday at 7:27 PM

Zig is a great low-level language. It's much better than C, while not being so much larger as e.g. Rust or C++. AFAICT Zig does well in embedded development, and should continue to do so. Note that Zig is not even 1.0 yet.

show 2 replies
wolttamyesterday at 8:22 PM

These tools let you get a massive codebase functional in 6 days. But, presumably, there's no better language to target than Rust (in terms of safety/performance), and therefore the rest of time can be spent making the birthed-in-6-days codebase better.

iwontberudeyesterday at 9:16 PM

But the author said "the code truly works, passing the test suite on Linux and soon other platforms" which just sounds really wise.