You can't say a technology isn't improving life for humans, what, just 4 years into the introduction of the technology? That is not even the blink of an eye.
Does literally no one look at things from a historical perspective? The history of automation is right there on the Internet, for you to peruse at will.
If a technology is improving life for a handful of people (that you happen to be part of)
but making it measurably worse for vastly more people
can you really say that that technology is "improving life for humans"?
What makes you so confident that it is improving life for humans? Are you seeing any specific signs yet?