alt Hacker NewsSorry but you're just seeing what you want to see. The idea that a 31b model is anywhere even in the ballpark of something like Opus 4.5 is just absurd on its face.
Replies
BoredomIsFun • yesterday at 7:50 AM
It would be true, if model providers did not throttle their models. I do not have definitive proof they do but the rumors are abundant.
creativeSlumber • yesterday at 3:48 PM
I think you are missing the point here. what matters is for that user the local models are good enough for their use case.
False. The absolute capability is irrelevant, with the proper harness 31b is more than adequate for a very large portion of the tasks I ask AI to do. The metric isn't how good the model is at Erdos Problems, it's how reliably it can remove drudgery in my life. It just autonomously reverse engineered a bluetooth protocol with minimal intervention, it's ability to react to data and ground itself is constantly impressive to me. I do a ton of testing with these models, today I had Gemma answer a physics problem that Opus 4.7 gave up on. With a decent harness and context the set of tasks where their capabilities are both good enough is very surprising. The tasks I have that stump Gemma often also stump Opus 4.7.