logoalt Hacker News

loup-vaillantyesterday at 9:25 AM1 replyview on HN

> You don't have to compromise anything.

So… I don’t have to compromise the ability to run any program I want on my machine, and I don’t have to compromise the ability to be root on my machine. Right? And of course, when I say "me", I’m talking about everyone, including cheaters. Meaning, we don’t have to compromise the cheater’s ability to run any program they want (that would include cheats), nor their ability to be root on their machine.

> In fact it is optimal to have the system be as secure as possible that way cheats can't mess with the game.

Secure for the game company you mean. I want a computer that’s secure for me, that responds to my commands. And again, "me" includes everyone and cheaters too.

---

The online gaming industry is not worth sacrificing individual ownership of computers.


Replies

charcircuityesterday at 3:40 PM

>So… I don’t have to compromise the ability to run any program I want on my machine, and I don’t have to compromise the ability to be root on my machine. Right?

Yes. You are free to do whatever you want on your machine.

>Meaning, we don’t have to compromise the cheater’s ability to run any program they want (that would include cheats), nor their ability to be root on their machine.

Yep. The only thing the cheater is unable to do is prove to the server that they aren't using cheats.

>Secure for the game company you mean.

No I mean that the operating system protects applications from messing with each other. The operating system should isolate each app for security purposes.

show 1 reply