logoalt Hacker News

knollimaryesterday at 9:40 PM4 repliesview on HN

the people who would leave after a layoff can do so preemptively, perhaps saving headcount for someone else?


Replies

croteyesterday at 10:22 PM

The problem is that such voluntary separation programs tends to disproportionate attract high performers. You're losing the "10x engineer" who has stuck around because they like being here - despite getting attractive offers from the competition.

The mediocre people who dread looking for a new job during a hidden recession aren't going to leave. They can't afford the risk of not being able to find a new place of employment before the severance pay runs out.

show 2 replies
jrochkind1yesterday at 10:09 PM

if you don't like the new direction you can leave now and get the known now severance package. All in all, I think it is right to offer people voluntary severence with package when you pull the rug out from under them as far as where they thought they were working.

show 1 reply
SpicyLemonZestyesterday at 10:58 PM

It's defensible to have a voluntary separation program with clear terms. Microsoft, for example, announced on April 23 that a voluntary separation program would launch on May 7. On that day they announced the precise terms of separation, with affected employees given until June 8 to participate. Perfectly reasonable.

What Gitlab is announcing here is that employees need to apply for a separation, at a yet-to-be-determined time under still-unknown terms, without a guarantee of acceptance, in the next 7 calendar days. Much different and just so much worse.

show 1 reply
starkparkeryesterday at 9:40 PM

[flagged]