alt Hacker NewsI see some 25 French municipal sites are on "sites.google.com". By default we also import and attribute the main domain google.com to those organizations. That is usually correct, but obviously wrong in this case.
The data was removed, and tomorrow's reports will reflect that.
the question is: if `https://www.google.com` were to be included in this analysis, would you expect to see any "high risk" findings?
and the reason i ask is that some of the findings, i have seen, would apply to google.com, yet no one would consider them "high risk", so why do this to other services?
this effort would be better served by raising attention to truly important issues, or defects, than to try to identify as many problems as possible, and for lack of a better word, presenting the results in a away that's unnecessarily dramatic