logoalt Hacker News

forestoyesterday at 5:24 PM5 repliesview on HN

Having a domain under the .us TLD once seemed appealing to me for practical reasons: It's short, consistently inexpensive, and hasn't already sold the vast majority of its useful namespace to squatters.

Unfortunately, it forbids WHOIS privacy services, which makes it a privacy and security hazard for personal domains. Pity, that.


Replies

anonuyesterday at 5:27 PM

There's almost no real privacy online in the US. When I search for my name my phone number and almost every address I've ever lived at it is publicly retrievable - on multiple sites. Even with a private WHOIS I get spam from various companies via my registrar asking to speak to me about making a website.

show 2 replies
KPGv2today at 2:24 AM

People running WHOIS against kylesmith.com might discover that it's owned by someone named Kyle Smith.

I'll actually offer my take: domain names under the US TLD are a shared, public good, and no one should be allowed to anonymously own a shared, public good.

NetMageSCWyesterday at 9:25 PM

Yes, I have a 3 letter .us domain that I’ve had for a while. Hard to get a three letter domain in any other popular TLD.

show 2 replies
hungryhobbityesterday at 5:26 PM

From TFA:

Will WHOIS requests leak my address?

Nope. Even though you must supply your address in the registration form, a WHOIS request for your locality domain will only show information about the registrar.

show 3 replies
yieldcrvyesterday at 6:14 PM

you can literally write anything in the whois though

registrars have forwarded me ICANN notices about having info verification for 10 years and nothing happened

nothingburger

show 4 replies