logoalt Hacker News

giantg2yesterday at 8:17 PM2 repliesview on HN

It still blows my mind. Shouldn't the government audit their contracting companies for egregious issues like this? Seems extremely reckless not to.


Replies

njovintoday at 1:50 AM

I've been through a handful of SOC2 audits and they've never asked us to _prove_ that we aren't storing passwords in plaintext or with reversible encryption (we weren't).

This is why so much of vetting & compliance is toothless. You can have robust change management, physical security, network security, identity management, etc. policies but absolutely nobody wants to spend enough on audit & enforcement to make them meaningful.

The gov't will make you _claim_ that you do all of these things before awarding a contract, but they won't ever check.

Good actors will do the right thing regardless because they know the consequences of cutting corners.

at-fates-handsyesterday at 8:53 PM

I'm pretty shocked as well. I thought every company stopped doing this like 20 years ago? Even for a legacy system that is a long time to continue storing credentials like that.

show 2 replies