logoalt Hacker News

bo1024yesterday at 11:36 PM3 repliesview on HN

The common denominator: the data needs to be owned by you, or at least made accessible. Companies love to create walled gardens where they own the content and control how you access it, making this kind of personalized interface impossible. Hopefully we can push back more now.


Replies

tptacekyesterday at 11:53 PM

I mean, hold up, if that thought lights you up I'm happy, but I don't actually think that's the common denominator. I used Things.app to track projects for a long time and ultimately fell out of love with it. Things.app didn't own my data; it's a pure UI app.

But now it occurs to me: I know precisely how I work, I know what patterns are valuable to me, I know when and how I need to remind myself of things. I don't know why I haven't already started building my Things.app replacement. But I'd guess I have it to a place where I'm happy by this time Saturday.

Honestly, it's harder for me to think of daily-driver apps where this wouldn't be the case. I guess vector graphics editing? I'm not going to vibe up a vector editor. But I'll bet all the money in my pocket that 5 years from now, the real value in vector graphics tools will be their API/SDK, not the packaged application experience.

show 2 replies
dharmatechtoday at 3:31 AM

I agree that owning the data is ideal:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129841

satvikpendemtoday at 2:31 AM

Not necessarily, you can ask the LLM to reverse engineer the protocol.