One needs to be careful of citing papers - Pangram was not tested on the most recent models; the most recent one in that report is Claude Opus 4. Notably, Pangram does worse on news reports than on other types of textual detection tasks, and its failure depends on the model used in a way that suggests Pangram detection is very sensitive to whatever sources it was used for training.

> Do you think you could?

Not the right question. I am saying that this particular article based on its tendencies and the historical writings of this author are LLM-assisted if not wholly generated.