logoalt Hacker News

eugenekoloyesterday at 8:05 PM5 repliesview on HN

WOuldn't proof of that be some grounds for breach of fiduciary duty?


Replies

tptacekyesterday at 8:31 PM

No. People have weird beliefs about what fiduciary duty means. It does not mean that companies are required at all intervals to maximize revenue or profit.

show 1 reply
jvanderbotyesterday at 8:18 PM

Dunno - is protecting yourself from high-profile criticism by doing whatever you want with assets you 100% own and are under no contractual obligation to share ... also in fiduciary duty?

minimaxiryesterday at 8:27 PM

It is not illegal to be petty during business negotiations.

8noteyesterday at 9:05 PM

the easy argument otherwise would be that if they sold the IP, they wouldnt be able to revive it in the future, and also they would have nate silver as a competitor in the space

nradovyesterday at 8:17 PM

Nope. There is really no case law to support such a legal theory.