logoalt Hacker News

peteriszayesterday at 7:01 AM3 repliesview on HN

I think it was a genuine attempt but they failed to find a simple enough solution.


Replies

wat10000yesterday at 9:10 PM

I’d say they failed to make it cheap enough, although maybe that goes with “simple.” I needed a roof replacement around the time when this looked like a viable option, but there’s no way I was going to pay a substantial multiple over the price of a normal roof plus solar panels for their snazzy integrated roof.

moffkalastyesterday at 9:14 AM

Invisible solar is a genuine use case in areas with shitty power tripping HOAs, but even regular solar takes a decade to break even, so if you sell something like that at inflated Tesla level prices then they simply never will and there is no reason to buy them in the first place.

show 3 replies
HerbManicyesterday at 9:07 PM

It think they under estimate the 'Green bling' factor. For many people if they are going to get solar, they want the neighbours to know. Got to get that virtue signalling in.

Not saying it is a huge factor but it is there.