logoalt Hacker News

macro-byesterday at 6:23 PM3 repliesview on HN

At my previous big tech employer we used to have a mercurial layer on top of our legacy version control system. I loved it, much simpler and more clear than the typical workflows I have to deal with in git. I get it that with git you have more power, but do really most teams need that?


Replies

juvolyyesterday at 6:53 PM

Mercurial wasn't as simple as Subversion. But with hg I still felt like understanding 80% of what the tool had to offer and actually being able to mold the timeline the way I wanted.

Git has so many gotchas, bells and whistles that whenever I'm doing something out of the ordinary I'm wondering if there isn't an easier / canonical / smarter way I should be doing it.

show 2 replies
Espressosaurusyesterday at 7:31 PM

Git doesn't give you more power, it just makes their internals your problem.

KwanEsqyesterday at 6:33 PM

Do you actually even have more power with git?

show 2 replies