logoalt Hacker News

nelsonicyesterday at 2:32 PM3 repliesview on HN

FreeBSD has the same roots as OpenBSD but the former has a “compatibility” focus whereas the latter has the security focus. Having a background in security, the choice was obvious for me. But each person/org should decide based on their needs. Haven’t had any issues running it on all major hardware (Dell, HP, Lenovo, Apple, etc) the UI isn’t as pretty as macOS on Desktop, but it runs Firefox & Chrome, etc. so you can do everything you need. If you have an older Lenovo or Mac lying around collecting dust, dive in!


Replies

riedelyesterday at 2:38 PM

Actually that is mostly current HW compat. NetBSD would be I guess the one for legacy HW compat.

show 1 reply
mxuribeyesterday at 2:58 PM

Yeah, thanks that helps! Its the old convenience vs security balancing act :-)

show 1 reply
wang_liyesterday at 2:54 PM

There was FreeBSD and NetBSD. NetBSD supporting many platforms while FreeBSD supported just x86. There was some contention between NetBSD developers and Theo and crew left to create OpenBSD. They all more or less have common ancestry being derivatives of 386BSD.

show 1 reply