logoalt Hacker News

London Mayor Blocks Palantir

163 pointsby ZiiStoday at 4:35 PM51 commentsview on HN

Comments

stephc_int13today at 4:49 PM

I don't understand how Palantir managed to sell their services outside of the US, given their deep ties to CIA, political positions and involment with US goverments.

show 5 replies
bromuktoday at 5:32 PM

I think a good consideration here is how would the outcry be if it was a Chinese company being woven into governmental and national health systems.

show 1 reply
senderistatoday at 4:53 PM

The only politicization of technology here was done by the Palantir CEO.

erucitoday at 5:19 PM

His spokesperson said Londoners only wanted to see public money being paid to companies that “share the values of our city”.

I wander if they'd care to further elaborate on that.

show 2 replies
hobofantoday at 5:51 PM

I'm wondering how this will effect the Palantir London office, which is their biggest European office. Local employment has often been a pawn in deals like this (see e.g. Microsoft & Munich), so I'm positively surprised to see a major with a spine here.

show 1 reply
testfrequencytoday at 5:29 PM

I posted this 5 hours ago and confusingly only received 4 upvotes:

Sadiq Khan blocks £50M Met police deal with Palantir https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48221296

show 1 reply
wrstoday at 5:34 PM

>A recent Met police trial of Palantir’s AI to monitor staff behaviour...

To be fair, the Met should get a little credit for applying Palantir to themselves first.

figberttoday at 5:45 PM

My understanding of Palantir's actual, technical offering is profoundly boring: a hosted platform that connects to existing diverse sources of data and organizes them according to well-defined (by Palantir's FDEs) useful schemas. I have developed this impression through actually building a product on the Foundry as well as several rounds of interviews. Frankly that is profoundly boring. The anti-Palantir propaganda, portraying them as this all-powerful Skynet software, is as much a part of their marketing as anything else.

On the other hand, their effectiveness appears to be less in question: the article above claims that Scotland Yard found hundreds of police officers to have been abusing their posts in various ways through use of the Palantir system. I am not a fan of corrupt cops, so I think this is good. Similar stories exist elsewhere, like a 68% reduction in 48-hour mortality at a Tampa hospital through deployment of Palantir's anti-sepsis monitoring tech.

Thus I arrive at the conclusion that this decision is ultimately a loss. Khan's legal standing appears to rely on them not investigating other potential suppliers—I'm not sure that there are any, and "develop these simple data systems in-house" is a bad option because if they could have they would. I suppose ultimately I don't think that Palantir's "bad vibes" among constituents should impact governments' desire to be effective in the programs they purport implement.

show 2 replies
lenerdenatortoday at 5:23 PM

We're going to need to send people to prison when this is all said and done if we're ever going to get other countries' business back.

tetris11today at 4:51 PM

Great, now kill the NHS deal

show 2 replies
LightBug1today at 4:43 PM

Excellent news.

CommanderDatatoday at 4:48 PM

Brilliant, no longer a Londoner but I really think Khans done amazing compared to his predecessors.

His alternatives look bleak and elitist, I would not be surprised in the slightest they reverse this.