No, that commit log is obviously not better than the page explaining the vulnerability and the exploit vectors.
Case in point: what's "tired" about the stack exploitation techniques they're using here?
And, while you're not right, even stipulating that you were, what would that matter? How is anyone better off with less explanation of a vulnerability?
The website explains an exploit. I've seen exploits before. The commit explains the unique issue.
I'm more interested in the why than the how.
I suppose people with different overall goals will see that differently.