Human cognition is poorly understood and much more complex than it seems.
For an example, look at some of Julia Mossbridge's work.
If even a small part of her work is true and valid, it points to something far outside our current framework.
You don't need to go as far afield as Mossbridge, though - that's an extreme example. Pretty much any modern neuroscience will make you question a lot of assumptions, at least it did for me.
> For an example, look at some of Julia Mossbridge's work.
Never heard of her but I just spent about 5 minutes looking.
Her PhD is in communication sciences and disorders [1], but apparently she’s a quantum physicist now:
> AMELIA is built on the Causally Ambiguous Duration-Sorting (CADS) effect — a breakthrough discovery by Dr. Julia Mossbridge showing that light, under classical boundary conditions, behaves differently based on future temporal boundaries. [2]
Filed under crank, not going to bother investigating further.
[1] https://books.google.com/books/about/Have_a_Nice_Disclosure....
[2] https://americanelectrodynamics.com/#technology