I don't think that's the full picture. Activist judges have been a problem for awhile now, and it seems to be mostly influenced by ideology rather than purely money.
You can't really venue shop for an "activist" judge but you can for one who will side with the powerful over the weak. Your comparison is itself not a full picture.
That's quite a claim. You need to cite your sources for this one, if you want to be taken seriously.
What’s an activist judge? Do you believe a judge can just rule whatever they want outside the framework of law?
It's certainly obviously true that one political party used "we will find judges who will overturn one particular court case" as a fundamental part of their campaigning for decades...