> the other side actually has reasons that you haven’t bothered to consider?
Cool, like what reasons, for example? The reasons given in this press release are transparently pretextual.
> Cool, like what reasons, for example? The reasons given in this press release are transparently pretextual.
OK, so once again, you’re dismissing the other side’s arguments as lies.
If you want to convince people of your argument, start by engaging in actual debate instead of simply calling your opponent names.
Also, once again: I am not your opponent. I don’t agree with this change.
> Cool, like what reasons, for example? The reasons given in this press release are transparently pretextual.
OK, so once again, you’re dismissing the other side’s arguments as lies.
If you want to convince people of your argument, start by engaging in actual debate instead of simply calling your opponent names.
Also, once again: I am not your opponent. I don’t agree with this change.