> So, besides the "official" reasons in the official press release (which I have already considered), what reasons have I failed to consider?

How many times do I have to repeat myself? I am not a proponent of this change.

I am saying that calling your opponent a liar is not a convincing debate tactic, nor does it add anything new or useful.

So you can start by explaining, in good faith, what is wrong with the argument that you’re dismissing without explanation.