If I'm reading that right this covers all of Meta's state lobbying spending which is $45M + $25M federally and it's not all directly related to this age gating stuff, but general shaping anti-child exploitation policy?

> On every social media regulation bill in Colorado, Meta takes an "Amending" position, actively fighting changes. Across 117 lobbying records on 22 bills:

> Bills regulating social media: Meta position is "Amending" (fighting) > The one bill putting the burden on OS providers: Meta position is "Monitoring" (watching)

> Meta fights bills that regulate Meta. Meta watches bills that regulate everyone else.

So their lobbyist choosing not to fight against the OS age gating is the big reveal.

The link doesn't show what you think it shows.

Yes, the source of these claims is AI slop from a new account with no history.