> represented in the training data

This isn’t a binary is/isn’t thing though. What if only 80% of my task is, how would I know that the other part isn’t, if I haven’t worked it through fully

What if my task is generally represented, but for my specific context, there are specific details that aren’t?

How would I know until I’ve reasoned through it myself? At that point having the LLM do the work doesn’t add much value