> Just as the teamsters tried to ban cars to protect horse carriage drivers
Is that true?
So a random poster makes an assertion and rather than Google it and verify it yourself you throw out a request for another random poster to concur? And that concurrence you will take at face value and then believe the original assertion?
No. Quite the opposite if these first search results I'm reading are any indicator.
So a random poster makes an assertion and rather than Google it and verify it yourself you throw out a request for another random poster to concur? And that concurrence you will take at face value and then believe the original assertion?