> But when they get into the business of slowing down technology adoption to protect workers, that's when they get into the territory of giving unions a bad name.
I would consider the emputus more on companies to not roll out new technology in a way that harms workers.
Why is it waymo's problem to help uber drivers?
> I would consider the emputus more on companies to not roll out new technology in a way that harms workers.
*Impetus, but also, why? Why is it a company's role to figure out how to soft land a technological advance that might cost you your job?