logoalt Hacker News

gausswhotoday at 3:33 PM1 replyview on HN

With sympathy to your appeal that 100% closures will force us to reckon with the problem, I suspect it'd only lead to missing the forest for the trees. This would come with substantial pains to the community. Potentially ones that knock-on to other pains.

You're at the root of why this is a tricky problem to solve. In fact there is no solution, just a wide basket of expensive things we should aspire to do to improve affairs.


Replies

hedoratoday at 3:46 PM

What pain, exactly?

- The local public school goes from 80 kids per grade to 40, and a new school opens across the street or just rents an existing building from the existing school district.

- Funding stays flat, and academic performance goes up.

- Administrators get to decide which teachers to lay off, and they will be de facto fired if they get rid of the high performers while keeping the low performers.

- If the union contracts make it impossible to retain the high-performers, then the school eventually shuts down, and teachers that are competitive on the job market get hired by the new school for similar pay / benefits.

- Teachers at the new school get evaluated on whether they do their job, and the new administrators have a strong financial incentive to use performance-based evaluation instead of seniority / nepotism / whatever.

I see no downside whatsoever.

show 1 reply