alt Hacker News> I'm not defending the company at all. My comment was about the YouTuber who got involved as a 3rd party for content production.
You have claimed the story is "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really trust the YouTube influencers for the whole story".
Unless you are completely incapable of understanding basic human communication, this obviously amounts to defending the company.
> You have claimed the story is "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really trust the YouTube influencers for the whole story".
False. I said that a 3rd party traveling across the country to serve papers himself and then sitting in front of the house while police are called 4 times is needless YouTube drama.
You are awfully obsessed with stalking my comment history and then misquoting what I said.
> Unless you are completely incapable of understanding basic human communication, this obviously amounts to defending the company
Also false. I’m talking about the drama YouTuber doing YouTube drama things. This is not equivalent to defending the corporation. This is a “I love pancakes” “Why do you hate waffles” situation.