alt Hacker NewsOr they thought that the losses were acceptable to avoid having to make sworn statements about the series of events that are still at issue in the previous owner's case and some events that may very well still be charged by Oregon prosecutors.
Replies
usehand • today at 12:39 AM
So they chose to lose a case on merits related to the other case instead of making statements that would help (if they are in the right)?
➕ show 1 reply
They didn't even lose any money, because by closing the store the damages were never paid.
It's really depressing to see to be honest.