What about the buisness side of things that does not care for shiny code, but shipping things to make money?

That simple arcade game (without in game transactions) needs to be fun, that website that needs to attract visitors (but not sell them anything or handle sensitive data)?

They don't care about abstract code quality, they care if it works and useful.

So a good coder here means he or she could get to working results according to what the client wants fast. And those things likely make up the vast majority of written code. So no wonder AI gets adopted as it is a powerful tool here to be even faster.

Not all code runs in airplanes, handles financial transaction or sensitive user data - for this you need the best code possible and nothing vibe coded or quick and dirty hacks.

And oh wonder, it is possible to combine both. Because yes, websites often include financial transactions nowdays, but that part can and should be handled with care. People who move slow and check things. And then those who are quick to build things on top of it.

But I strongly object to dividing programmers absolutely in good and bad programmers, when the field is so big and the requirements not the same.

Some optimize in speed, some in quality. And yes, some are just bad in both. And some can do both - but they are very rare, in my experience.