logoalt Hacker News

getnormalitytoday at 1:56 PM3 repliesview on HN

I read the counterclaims from Bricks and Minifigs here:

https://bricksandminifigs.com/blog/blog/2026/05/28/bricks-mi...

This post and TFA have a common issue: no one seems to have a clear, compellingly evidenced account of basic questions about the collection and its history under consignment:

1. What exactly was in the collection?

2. What happened to the collection after it was consigned: which sets were sold, which were stolen or lost, which were moved to off-site storage, etc.?

3. How much money did the original franchise owner owe the consigner for the sets sold?

The peripheral claims about e.g. police malfeasance are disturbing, but without this basic evidence about the substance of the matter, I don't know if it's a great idea for an online mob to take sides.


Replies

abirchtoday at 2:35 PM

You're right that we don't have the facts. That said, the way that Bricks and Minifigs handled this has been horrible. The CEO should have said on camera that he's willing to work with the lego owner to return the property and to work with police to charge the former franchise owner with theft.

If you see this clip, this is when corporate was removing the previous franchisee https://youtu.be/wscQpkcwgNU?si=_k_EDfs4NmO5riB5&t=126

Ovahtoday at 2:14 PM

Have you seen the youtube videos? They paint a pretty clear picture.

solenoid0937today at 2:01 PM

Seems like the ex-franchisee, Chrystal Law, essentially stole the sets and still has possession of them in some off-site location.

TBH the fact that Chrystal was not making payments and the store had to forcibly repossess the store, points to her being the problem.

show 1 reply