alt Hacker NewsDespite that, for some reason, these well funded criminal networks keep buying into these weird phone deals instead. I genuinely don't understand why, but they do.
> So no, I think the burden of proof falls on you to show that the vast majority of .onion usage is illegal.
How does the burden of proof fall on me for a claim I (intentionally) did not make?
> Despite that, for some reason, these well funded criminal networks keep buying into these weird phone deals instead. I genuinely don't understand why, but they do.
Given how many of them have been CIA honeypots, they must have amazing marketing.
> How does the burden of proof fall on me for a claim I (intentionally) did not make?
Nice trick -- make a very clear implication and claim that you didn't make a positive claim.