alt Hacker News> Who is accountable for AI agents?
Obviously the person who built and deployed the agent (the claw in this case).
If we treat this as a hard question, we risk treating AI systems as people rather than tools. This is exactly what Armin warned about in his "clanker" post last week.
Why is that obvious? Why not the model provider(s)? That is what we do in other cases with product responsibility.