Humans of course will screw at least 1% of the time, at least judged retroactively.
The fun part is, if you have non-trivial inputs, even if you don’t change anything, you’ll likely get a different 1% set of errors each time no matter how perfect your judges.
10% seems pretty high, but it really all depends on what you’re evaluating. If it’s all weird edge cases….
alt Hacker News
Humans of course will screw at least 1% of the time, at least judged retroactively.
The fun part is, if you have non-trivial inputs, even if you don’t change anything, you’ll likely get a different 1% set of errors each time no matter how perfect your judges.
10% seems pretty high, but it really all depends on what you’re evaluating. If it’s all weird edge cases….