logoalt Hacker News

Spoiling Linux Kernel with "sanctioned" code

74 pointsby ValdikSSyesterday at 2:51 PM18 commentsview on HN

Comments

flashmozzgtoday at 1:59 AM

Is there a CVE for this?

mike_hockyesterday at 7:59 PM

Obvious attack vector for Russia: Submit fixes to severe bugs that can't realistically be fixed any other way.

thefounderyesterday at 5:47 PM

I guess the Russians will have to learn the Chinese way and perhaps the Chinese language as well?

1atticeyesterday at 7:17 PM

I've been thinking lately that what underpinned the FOSS golden age was not actually decentralized VCS and high-quality forges, nor even ZIRP, but rather peacetime.

After a period of branches and patchsets, full national hard forks are going to become de rigeur, and linux-derived OSes across the world are going to bloom necessarily, as we no longer have the kind of ambient trust required to collaborate across borders.

Look forward to Euro-linux, Sino-BSD, and I guess probably some sort of GCC-area build as well.

Patches will be accepted across national boundaries with only the highest scrutiny, which itself will likely be provided by nationalized AI platforms.

Gods I hate this era

show 1 reply
gmerctoday at 5:01 PM

Perfect usecase for AI, by US legal doctrine, copyright is gone after you feed it through and so should sanctions /s

robobullyyesterday at 4:41 PM

This post is apparently not publicly shown on the main page for some reason.

show 1 reply
BrenBarnyesterday at 7:37 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
_user_accountyesterday at 10:10 PM

Yeah, it sucks.

> This adds ~1ms latency per transfer cycle for rapid bidirectional communication which leads to half the USB 1.1 speed for smaller packets at best.

Still, I don't think this patch should be applied /for everyone/. Maybe compile out-of-tree and load as a kernel module, if possible?

show 2 replies