logoalt Hacker News

hedgehogtoday at 4:05 AM1 replyview on HN

The "tradeoff" warning implies they stand by their thinking and don't think there was anything qualitatively wrong with it which, if nothing else, is helpful so potential customers can know how they think. I think the core lesson is if you want reliable infrastructure to build into an application you should use a different provider. (edit: I'm not specifically an Anthropic hater, but having just spent some time adding complexity to an app to deal with the existing refusal behavior in Sonnet... I understand why they might want this in an end user chatbot but for an API it's really not acceptable)


Replies

brooksttoday at 12:31 PM

Is it not a trade off? I think they made the wrong choice, but it seems reductive so say there was no choice at all and should never have been consideration of trade offs of silent versus not.

Even wide open, uncensored models are often the product of a deliberate choice. I have a hard time faulting people for intentionality (even when they get it wrong).

show 1 reply