This is a pretty reasonable statement and I'm not sure how you could interpret this as "sucking up to the admin."
I can read it as both TBH.
First sentence by itself is mundane "regulators are good", which most people agree with, and also libertarians will object to regardless of leader.
Second sentence is obviously sucking up, though is the same level of sucking up found on every stereotypical LinkedIn post.
It's a pretty reasonable statement if you work for Anthropic and are eyeing your stock options nervously and your competitors even more so.
No one is "grateful" for being labelled a security risk. The statement reads more like a Chinese "Ah Q" story than a real response.
(Unless they are piping the F1 Mercedes theme song in the announce system at anthropic, in which case maybe you are right)