alt Hacker NewsCaddy compatibility for zeroserve: 3x throughput and 70% lower latency
Comments
No ACME! That is a dealbreaker
https://github.com/losfair/zeroserve/blob/main/CADDY_COMPAT....
"Caddy compatible" minus everything that matters, like ACME and plugins. And NGINX still steals the show. Not everything needs to be rewritten.
Exposing services that use io_uring is a hard pass. It's only been a handful of weeks since the last security advisory.
I still think of eBPF as not being Turing-complete. There is still a complexity limit in the verifier. Even if someone did implement Game of Life by having the program set a timer to run itself. https://isovalent.com/blog/post/ebpf-yes-its-turing-complete...
From a technical standpoint, these are always impressive projects, but I've always wondered: has anyone ever encountered a use case where the Caddy was the bottleneck?
Another vibe coded, dead in 6 month Rust project.
People that trully need performance are not going to use a random server that has 0 support/ track record.
Interesting. Trying to get some of the performance advantages of TUX/IIS without as much insecurity makes sense for some big players, I guess.
The usual 3400 lines lock file and AGENTS.md raise some questions about the aforementioned security, though.
No thanks
Fudge, I really need to carve out time today to play with zeroserve. Very cool stuff
Anyone else got a really weird Chorme pop-up asking which cert to use for su3.io:443?
Very bizarre, never seen that before.
Thumbprints: