Attribution isn't the relevant part. Lying about your lab's capabilities is.
Sounds like the whole AI movement.
It seems to me like the lies are both for the same reason. To capture attention and profits that are not deserved.
But the whole game is lying and stealing isn't it?
leopards ate my face
I do not see anyone lying.
The model card says:
> Post-trained from Qwen 3.5 397B
The model card also says that they use an inference framework based on "SwiReasoning: Switch-Thinking in Latent and Explicit for Pareto-Superior Reasoning LLMs" by Shi et al.:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05069
So the sources seem properly attributed.
They only claim that what they did to "Qwen 3.5 397B" has improved the LLM, including, as expected, with "strong performance in Portuguese".
That's also something all the AI companies have been doing.