logoalt Hacker News

onlyrealcuzzoyesterday at 6:48 PM11 repliesview on HN

> The only thing they value is money and giving teenage girls depression.

You really think if they didn't work there, someone else wouldn't?

You really think them and only them are the people capable of doing whatever technical things are causing the problems you perceive?


Replies

98codesyesterday at 6:51 PM

"Someone else would be willing to ruin this, so I may as well ruin it and get paid for it" is not a direction everyone wants to, or even is willing to go.

jlengrandyesterday at 7:01 PM

In case you care, what you're doing is called causal impotence https://philpapers.org/rec/NORTIO-18. Then you can also search why it does matter.

show 2 replies
Retricyesterday at 6:54 PM

Someone else isn’t a 1:1 replacement, when people refuse to work for you you’re stuck offering higher wages and or taking worse employees.

How well a job is compensated on average very much depends on how willing and able the average person is to do it.

jbxntuehineohyesterday at 8:02 PM

But your honor! If I didn't sell heroin, someone else would!

show 1 reply
tommyogodyesterday at 8:50 PM

"If I didn't cheat on you then someone else would" good lord

bigstrat2003yesterday at 7:59 PM

"Someone else would do it if I don't" is not, and never has been, a valid argument for whether something is moral to do. If you want to argue that it's morally permissible to work at Facebook, you need to argue that on its own merits, not by appealing to fallacies.

lo_zamoyskiyesterday at 8:03 PM

> You really think if they didn't work there, someone else wouldn't?

Putting Meta aside as I do not have a sufficiently deep view of the total scope of work at Meta and its relation to its misdeeds, I never understood how anyone found this fallacious line of reasoning convincing.

So what if someone else would do it? The point is that you are morally responsible for your actions and your actions alone.

It horrifies me completely to realize that so many people would excuse their own gravely immoral actions on the incomprehensible grounds that if they didn't do it, someone else would. Where is the logic? It is such a severely morally and psychologically crippled way of thinking. Yes, if I don't shoot the innocent civilian in the head, then SS-Schütze Schmidt will do it anyway, so I might as well do it. Incredible.

Morality is not some calculus that is concerned about whether certain events occur or about optimizing some sum total of events. It is about how you, personally, use your agency. That's it!

freejazzyesterday at 7:12 PM

>You really think if they didn't work there, someone else wouldn't?

What does that have to do with any person's individual morals?

bluerooibosyesterday at 7:04 PM

[flagged]