…and my comment was in reply to someone who stated they’d never met a programmer who values attractive code over shipping a product. ;)
Can’t we value both?
If we consider that “attractive code,” to many means simple, elegant… and therefore easy to extend, maintain, few errors, performant, etc.
Can’t we value both?
If we consider that “attractive code,” to many means simple, elegant… and therefore easy to extend, maintain, few errors, performant, etc.