logoalt Hacker News

bombcaryesterday at 6:25 PM1 replyview on HN

That's the missing link on these - the owner is making payments either way - the bank is getting their money.

They don't want to disrupt the flow or trigger contract clauses, so they cover the missing cashflow from elsewhere.


Replies

mlsuyesterday at 9:30 PM

They are extending loans though. In a normal market, requesting an extension when the bank knows you're underwater should set off some risk alarm bells and trigger a denial. The "normal person" intuition about how loans work is correct here: if I try to refi my house when it's underwater and I've lost my income, the bank denies the refi. That incentivizes me to do what it takes to make the bank whole, or, make the appropriate decision to leave my house and let someone else who can afford it take over payments.

When everyone, the regulator, the operator, and the bank, are whistling a tune, when the whole sector is fucked, everyone has a big problem. How big? About as big as hundreds of buildings in the downtown of every major city sitting half-empty!

That's a pretty big problem. Maybe not as large as 08 but definitely structural. We're all paying indirectly for this office space to sit empty, instead of being able to use it.

show 1 reply