> Chinese nationals should be assumed to act on behalf of China

I acknowledged this, you quoted it.

> it really isn't difficult to understand...

Where does 'it' end? Is the subsidiary not operating at the behest of their parent? I need to know when it's safe to no longer be scared.

Swedish nationals should be assumed to act on behalf of Sweden.

That's fine, but what stops those Chinese nationals at Geely from messing with their cars now?