alt Hacker News> The real question is, what is the metric of ‘success’ - improved public health for the entire population at low cost, or bloated returns for pharmaceutical investors?
This is a false dichotomy and this kind of zero sum thinking is exactly the root of so much misunderstanding of economics that's all the rage these days (and probably forever).
Wealth is created by innovation, not transfered. "Rent seeking" is wealth transfer but most companies provide a service that is more valuable than what exists without them.
The goal of capitalism is to allow the capitalist to increase their profits by improving the public good. "Public good" being measured by what people are willing to spend their money on. It isn't to increase the capatalists profits at all costs. The entire idea is built on exploiting the capitalist's impulse to increase profits to also serve the public good.
Replies
The quintessential counterexample to your claim that the goal of capitalism is linked to improving the public good. I think we can agree that curing disease is a ‘public good’, compared to disease maintenance in which the patient must buy a drug once a month for the rest of their life just to keep the disease in check, yes? While also potentially remaining as an infectious source of disease? But what if curing a disease eliminates demand for maintenance drugs, harming capitalist returns?
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/goldman-asks-is-curing-patie...
I hate to break it to you. Private Equity does not care about the common good, only profits. They only bow to increase price and out side of medicine, reduce the qualifying of the product.
Want common good, start creating disdain for the wealths in societies.