logoalt Hacker News

ktm5jtoday at 6:22 PM4 repliesview on HN

It's their organization. They are allowed to make decisions about what software their employees use. I'm a die-hard Mozilla fan, but I don't find this unreasonable.


Replies

cmeacham98today at 6:27 PM

The problem is Google appears to label this as a security feature. I'm fine with the feature existing, but it should say something like "require Chrome" or "block Firefox" not "require a secure browser (wink wink we actually mean Chrome)"

show 2 replies
jchwtoday at 6:58 PM

Note that making lock-in features like this effectively proprietary to the Chrome browser is only possible because of the fact that it's the same company making Google Workspace and Google Chrome.

I absolutely see many problems with this and you really ought to as well.

show 1 reply
dijittoday at 6:24 PM

Google and Microsoft shouldn’t be giving levers that bake you more into their ecosystem regardless.

Your corporate serfdom is not in question, but I disagree with that notion too.

show 2 replies
wslhtoday at 6:47 PM

I would say it's common to find dark patterns that involves ambiguity like the discussion we are having here. We can't know for sure but Google can increase the probability of being on their ecosystem.