Does he not act for the benefit of shareholders (in the best possible future, at least)

Rate-limited edit: my (evasive?) answer was that Stoics were careful enough not to use the word "good", but the more subtle, one might accuse utilitarian, "agathos" in that scenario

Should I interest you in the needle's eye left for cybernetic* shareholders?

*Neither fully machine, nor fully human, nor even monolithic, but definitely no camel, bc camel, unlike horse, can survive anywhere and were once native to the USA (arguably)