As someone who has lived in a 'mixed block' in zone 1, I think it's delusional to characterise social housing tenants as 'teachers and nurses'. I suspect most teachers and nurses are already in private sector housing in London.
I think it could be OK to sell all social hosing in Zone 1/2 and use that money to pay higher wages for teachers and nurses plus state built replacement social housing in zone 4-6. There's probably some other space in the welfare system, look at the motability scandal or the increase in PIP claims.
A lot of social housing in the UK (about 45%) isn't owned by councils so can't really be sold off by the state?
Social housing is the council budget - I was referring to Housing Benefit.
What would happen to the people who live in the houses?
Dame Shirley is that you? I thought you died last month.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/may/05/dame-shirley...
ETA: there are possibly five hundred schools in Zone 2 alone. That is maybe 35,000 school staff you're saying should not be socially housed in about 35 square miles. They all have to commute in because, why?