logoalt Hacker News

guybedotoday at 2:35 AM6 repliesview on HN

This is a bit ironic, Anthropic complaining about a competitor using claude data to build its own product when Anthropic basically used all of human knowledge production to build claude, i don't think they paid every magazine, author, journalist, etc ...

This is almost standard practice in any competitive industry anyways. Disassemble your competitor's product, study it and try to reproduce / improve.


Replies

roxolotltoday at 2:50 AM

Yea I’ll never have any sympathy for this claim given that Claude is built on theft

uproarchattoday at 3:17 AM

It's a claude eat claude world out there

Aldipowertoday at 8:15 AM

Yeah, and I believe Anthropic would "distill back" without thinking twice, if the other model would be good enough.

anematodetoday at 2:50 AM

Yup, it's hard to take seriously any complaint about "stealing" Anthropic's services, when their entire business is based on massive theft.

show 2 replies
sp527today at 3:39 AM

Ironically, it's likely that the only reason USG let them get away with this — instead of making obvious and necessary adjustments to copyright law — was so that the industry would remain competitive with China.

show 1 reply
reasonableklouttoday at 3:57 AM

Anthropic did pay $1.5B to authors. But yes, it would be much better if they paid everyone on the internet dividends from every Claude chat. Or released Claude as an open model.

In practice, the former isn't very realistic, while the latter is politically dead as this is becoming a national security issue.

show 2 replies