I guess "paid to use our model" doesn't sound as sanction-worthy as "illicitly extracted .. model capabilities" and "attacked".

I guess we can say that Anthropic attacked and illicitly extracted data from WikiPedia, Reddit, Stack Overflow, etc, etc.

X.ai attacked and illicitly extracted data from OpenAI

https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/30/elon-musk-testifies-that-x...

Meta attacked and illicitly extracted data from LibGen

https://x.com/jason_kint/status/1879152507865485497/photo/1

And more generally the US-based AI companies have perpetrated a massive distillation attack on the entire human race.

Not that it makes any difference, but I wonder if Anthropic, while claiming that Alibaba "extracted Claude model capabilities", in fact have any clue what Alibaba did with their paid Claude responses. It would seem to amount to industrial espionage if Anthropic do know, although I expect they don't.