logoalt Hacker News

azan_yesterday at 2:37 AM1 replyview on HN

Yes, that study shows safety of the vaccine, so what’s your point? Could you actually just say what’s your point? I can’t tell you why you are wrong if you don’t tell me what’s your problem.


Replies

trimethylpurineyesterday at 11:43 AM

27% had a bad reaction to the treatment.

Name another vaccine (pre COVID definition) that has a similar statistical outcome.

Pre-COVID routine vaccines have a 1/500,000 or less negative rate. Hell, even 1/10,000 would be reasonable in an emergency (should be optional at that rate though).

1/3 is not okay. That's far worse than the disease it's supposed to treat.

You need to have horns and a tail to call 1/3 safe. There is no justification for that.

And look what happened as a result. People stopped trusting their govt and vaccines altogether and we have outbreaks of things we never saw in our lifetime.

show 1 reply