It’s surprisingly simple, actually.

A cricket pitch is a long strip. Bowler bowls from one end, batter strikes the bowl from the other. Scoring is done by running from one end of that strip to the other (the unit of scoring is literally called a run). Six legal bowls make an over.

There are two batters in play at each point in time, one at each end of the pitch, and they both must run towards the other end of the pitch (therefore swapping places) to score.

Bruce Edgar had scored 102 runs, was not out (in the same sense as baseball — meaning he was still in play), but, because they either didn’t manage to score any runs, or scored twos, he spent the whole over on the non-striking side of the pitch.

As an American it has taken me nearly half a century of occasionally watching cricket to barely comprehend what that sentence means. I love it.

I was reminded of this hilarious skit about English sports. https://youtu.be/E_6d3JBBo4s

I like this explanation of cricket for Americans: https://www.dangermouse.net/cricket/baseball.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_6d3JBBo4s

> Americans

Everyone not from one Uk, India... maybe Australia you mean?

This article was like reading Harry Potter.

X, who was Y, was stuck at Z the entire W.

(Bruce Edgar), who was (on (102 not out)), was stuck at (the (non-striker's end)) the entire (over).

• An “over” consists of six opportunities to hit the ball and score “runs”. (A “run” is the basic unit of scoring.)

• "102 not out" indicates how many runs the player had personally contributed to the team's score. The number is large enough to suggest that this was the player who was playing particularly well in that match.

So the sentence is saying that the player who could be expected to make good use of whichever of those six opportunities he got, did not get any of them.

I think as with most cases of unfamiliar jargon, the sentence can be confusing not because of unusual words but because of everyday words being used with technical meanings ("not out", "end", "over").