logoalt Hacker News

jjk166last Monday at 10:38 PM3 repliesview on HN

Or perhaps the standards of evidence established for a pre-industrial society when eye-witness testimony was the best that could reasonably be achieved is not necessarily the optimal system for a digital society where everyone carries a high definition video camera in their pocket at all times.


Replies

DiscourseFanyesterday at 1:54 AM

Yes a high definition video camera that is slowly becoming indistinguishable (and has always been subject to tampering regardless) from an artificially generated version. We never have anything beyond judgement.

broken-kebabyesterday at 2:00 PM

But in what way do you believe these standards are inadequate? Video from phones is used in courts when available and admissible.

expedition32yesterday at 3:33 AM

This is why crimes used to have prosecution time limits. Nobody expected eye witness accounts to surface after 40 years. But DNA is eternal.

show 2 replies